Pandav Sthan (Panr)
A Promising Site on the Mahabharat Trail in Bihar
![]() |
| Excavated Remains at Panr (Photo Courtesy - Aditi Nandan from http://www.artzindia.com) |
The Archaeologist’s spade at work in a North Bihar site
has served to modify the contours of concurrent understanding about development
of civilization in the past. Taking back the story of civilization in the
region by thousands of years, the discoveries may lead to something akin to the
Harappa revelations about a century ago, which then had redefined the known
History of India. This Promising site with immense potential to change the
regional History has inspired me to start following and analyzing sites lying
on the Mahabharat[i]
trail. The otherwise sleepy and non-descript village named as ‘Panr’ or
‘Pandavsthan’ in Samastipur district, Bihar, earlier visited only by winter
migratory birds has become the ‘new destination’ for the Historical researcher.
Located at about 110 kms from Patna and about 5 km. northwest of the
Dalsinghsarai subdivision, it lies on the northern bank of the Ganga and at the
southern boundary of the ancient Mithila[ii] region. Surrounded by large
picturesque water bodies, which were frequented for hunting birds, crocodiles
and other wildlife during the British era, stories of which are still
remembered by old-timers, the site must have had an easy access to water in the
ancient past. The surrounding lakes seem to have been formed by the dead beds
of Ganga and Balan which once flowed nearby and are not very far even today
with Bālan flowing at about 2 kms and the Ganga at about 22 kms to the south,
respectively. Traditionally, locals have believed that the ‘Pandavas’ of the
Mahabharat fame, had stayed here for some time during their journeys across
India, and a temple thus revers the said site.
![]() |
| The Location of Panr |
During
my childhood days, I was a frequent visitor to my maternal grandfather’s
village ‘Pachpaika’, located just about 3 kms from Panr. It was perhaps
sometime around 1991 that I first learnt about the existence of historical
antiquities and their being unearthed at Panr. In this remote locality, news
about a potter who while digging his fields for clay came across some treasure
trove in the form of a pot containing ancient coins, had then spread like
wildfire. Those were the days when the Mahabharata serial was being regularly
screened on television, and villagers who watched often visualised the wealth
of the Pandavas and wondered whether they may have left antiquities at Panr.
The pot which was the talk of the locality was claimed by some as having
contained gold coins, while others assigned them as copper or bronze. None seem
to have had actually seen or verified the rumours, which seemed to have
originated from the shop of the local goldsmith who was believed to have dealt
in some. But, it did lead to frantic digging at the site by the locals. While
some diggers could actually find some coins including those of Gold probably in
the process, the main discovery was that of an ancient township, the walls of
which were constructed of baked bricks.
| Pandava Temple, Panr (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
With
most of the houses around the site then (in 1991) being constructed out of mud
and straw, the locals utilized the discovery as an opportunity to pillage
bricks from the ancient site, and within days, several truck-loads of brick had
been removed for being placed in newer constructions. One of the villagers who
had collected some bricks while tilling his fields in Panr showed me a specimen
which looked very different in design from the present bricks. Though baked in
the same style of kiln firing, the bricks had a unique dimension being about 3
inches thick and of a rectangular shape with a length of almost 1.5 feet and
breadth of 1. There were three finger stretch marks on the top for reasons
unknown, but believed to have been some religious signage or perhaps a mark of
the brick kiln where they were first baked. As I stayed at the village, while
spending my summer vacation, I heard of more frantic digging going on at the
site, till one fine morning when it stopped upon orders of the then District
Magistrate, who probably happened to learn about the continuing rampage from
sources. This came as a big relief, and also inspired me to join the civil services
later in life, in order to meaningfully contribute to society.
| Ancient Well now subsumed by Tree (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
I
visited Pachpaika regularly till the summer of 1993, after which I had to move
out of Bihar and thus my visits became irregular. But I do remember that after
the activities at the site were stopped, not much interest was shown by the
locals who continued to still rever the place as usual. From the villagers, I
had then learnt that the site possessed an ancient well into which banana
stumps when dropped did not emerge above but probably got transported to the
river Ganga or some other unknown place by some probable underground tunnel
which sucked them within. Some also claimed to have seen human remains inside
the well when it was being cleaned etc. Several stories about Panr were in vogue
while people were looking for more legendary associations about the site. As I
joined the police service in Bihar, from 2003 onwards, I again tried to keep
track of the developments at Panr. I learnt that the KP Jayaswal Institute of
Patna was conducting excavations at the site which was also visited by the
Chief Minister of Bihar sometime in 2012[iii].
The CM had seen the antiquities recovered from the continuing excavations
during his visit, a photograph of which had been then carried in the
newspapers.
Visit to Panr on 22nd June, 2015
I
visited the site on the 22nd of June 2015, years after having heard
stories about it. The ancient low mound measuring about 2 meters in height and
spread over about 38 acres is approached by a narrow village road. Expecting a
protected area within fencing, I was surprised to see no such structure at the
spot now marked by a temple dedicated to the Pandavas and a school which was
full of children when we happened to visit. Upon reaching the site, I firstly
asked for the location of the ancient well I had been hearing of since my
childhood days. I was directed to a well grown Pipal tree which had now
subsumed the well now almost covered and located on the boundary of the
recently constructed Pandava temple. The site where the diggings had taken
place in recent years were found to be covered and under cultivation. They were
pointed at a distance. Apart from this excavated mound which was excavated,
historical settlements at Panr seem to have extended up to the lake (chaur)
area with scope for further excavation remaining.
| Excavated Site now filled and being used for Agriculture (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
| Visit to Panr - Ancient Well in the Background (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
Explorations and the Excavation at Panr
Though
Panr retained its religious sanctity and had a small shrine occasionally
visited by locals who often related it to the Mahabharat stay, it was hardly
remembered for its historical importance till when in the winter season of
1972-73, Dr. Sita Ram Roy, assisted by Shri B K Sinha and Shri N C Ghosh of the
Directorate of Archaeology and Museums, Govt of Bihar, visited it during their
exploration. A few sherds of the NBPW and its associated black ware were
collected from the site. Besides, a copper cast coin (with elephant on the
obverse and crescented hill on the reverse), an earthen pot with rope-impressed
design and a stone bead were found in the collection of one Dr Pamdeo Mahta.
Interestingly, the district of Samastipur has also yielded some other important
antiquities from other sites. In 1974-75, Stone sculptures of Vishnu and
eight-armed Durga, datable to Late Pala period were discovered by Shri B S Jha
of the Archaeological Survey of India, at Simria-Bhindi village. In the course
of his exploration, in 1982-83, B Nath of the mid-eastern circle of the
Archaeological survey, discovered a large mound in Mangalgarh village yielding
NBPW along with grey and black wares and a few terracotta figurines.
Even as several ancient
sites in the vicinity like Mangalgarh remain to be fully explored, the K. P.
Jayaswal Research Institute in Patna conducted the excavation at Panr by the
permission of Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). The Birbal Sahni Institute
of Paleobotany, Lucknow assisted the findings through radio carbon-dating of
the discoveries made in the process. The excavation at the site was commenced
way back in 1999 but was halted several times as a result of which the
researchers finally tasted success in or around 2010. Important terracotta
artifacts and other brick structures were discovered at the site which revealed
a history of continuous ancient cultures from the Neolithic age to the Gupta
period. The full excavation report is yet to be
probably made public but a look at the report as available on the website of
the Institute reveals a continuous series of settlements dating back from 4500
BC to about 600 AD at the ancient site. Burnt brick structures dating back to
Sunga and Kushana periods were also dug. Terracotta figures, gem stones
(cornelian, agate, etc.), and latter day inscriptions in Brahmi script were
found.
![]() |
| Excavated Remains at Panr (Photo Courtesy - Aditi Nandan from http://www.artzindia.com) |
Excavations
conducted during the whole decade unearthed 52 agricultural and animal remains
and revealed a 7.50 m thick cultural deposit, divisible into five phases. The
first settlers at the site used red ware, grey ware and black-and-red ware. The
sherds in red ware and grey ware showed lustrous burnishing on the exterior
while the interior was rough and hard-brushed. During the earliest Period I, the lowest deposit, people
used bone objects such as arrowheads and points, beads made of steatite and
agate and terracotta objects like beads and hop scotches for which the
radiocarbon dates ranged between 2412-4261 BC, the latter date being an
isolated with the cluster falling within the 3rd millennium BC. Archaeologists
faced a difficulty in designating the early phase at Panr, the dates of which
were seen as abnormal in the absence of any Neolithic tools at the site, and
thus indicating an advanced civilisation. The radiocarbon dates here are much
earlier than the previous discoveries made at the Neolithic site of Chirand in
Saran district, also on the banks of the Ganga, and thus thought to have been
probably connected, even as the potsherds of the earliest phases of the two
sites closely resembled each other.
In the next Period
II, having all ingredients of a chalcolithic culture, people began to use
black-slipped pottery in addition to the earlier types. The sherds frequently
exhibited clay mixed with paddy-husks. Certain sherds in black-and-red ware and
grey ware had white paintings in form of white dots, straight lines, oblique
lines, and receding curves with shapes like dishes, bowls, dishes- on-stands,
vases and basins. The use of copper was confirmed from the copper hooks and
bangles discovered, even as bone remained in use for making tools and weapons.
The profuse use of bone and the evidence of copper hooks suggested hunting and
fishing activities of the people in this period, but agriculture was confirmed
by the retrieval of charred grains and paddy-husks. There was a phase between
the chalcolithic horizon and that of the Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW),
when iron made its appearance in the form of recoveries of an arrowhead, a
blade and an unidentified object.
![]() |
| Antiquities-Chalcolithic (Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
![]() |
| Painted Perforated Potsherds , Chalcolithic (Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
During the Period
III, represented by NBPW, the frequency of bone tools and weapons did not
decrease, but that of iron and copper increased proportionately as a medium for
making objects. Among the iron objects were found nails, daggers, spearheads,
knives, sickles, a ploughshare, a harpoon and a hoe. Copper objects included
antimony rods, earrings and finger-rings. Thus iron was used for productive
purpose and weaponry, while copper was shaped into ornaments. Among the
terracotta objects, beads and well-fired sling balls seemingly catapulted by
some device to serve as missiles were most numerous. Several human and animal figurines
were also discovered along with copper punch-marked coins and cast coins in the
terminal phase. These, together with the luxury objects and the deluxe ware in
this horizon indicated that the site was becoming associated with a broad
circuit of trade exchanges.
![]() |
| Terracotta-Objects-NBPW (Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
![]() |
| Iron objects, Bone arrow heads points and beads of Semi precious Stone NBPW(Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
Period IV at the site, belonging to
Śunga-Kuṣāṇa phase, was marked by vigorous constructional activities in two
broad phases, with the first phase having bricks measuring 42x22x5cm, and
second with those measuring 38x22x5cm. This phase yielded ring wells, having
several courses. During the Kuṣāṇa period, glass objects appeared in greater
frequency, and replaced copper as the preferred material for making ornaments,
as bone was no longer important for making tools and weapons. During the Śunga
period, terracotta figurines were made, as confirmed from the discovery of
several human and animal figurines alongwith a mould. During the Kuṣāṇa times,
terracotta corn-rubbers and spindle-whorls were produced in great quantity.
![]() |
| Terracotta-Figures-Kushana (Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
![]() |
| Kushana Ringwells (Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
Period V at the site belonging to Gupta
times was represented by red-slipped ware having thin rims and constructional
activities marked by the reuse of old bricks. Among the antiquities, an
inscribed ivory ring and a bone seal, having the name “Indracetasya” inscribed on it was interesting.
![]() |
| Ivory Ring, Bone Seal, Gupta Period (Photo - K P Jayaswal Institute at http://kpjri.res.in/) |
The Mahabharat Trail !
The
Mahabharat survives as a key to explore some long forgotten and silent facets
of ancient India. The longest epic in the world, it houses several stories and
legends interspersed into the main narrative, which often give a definitive
indication about various subjects like the ancient geography of India, the
position of the rivers, lakes, kingdoms, the then ruling kings, their pastimes,
economies, military tactics and famous pilgrimage destinations. The legendary
Saraswati well described in the Ancient Vedic texts seems to have still existed
as a living river during the Mahabharat as is well exemplified and illustrated
by the detailed descriptions of several sites and pilgrimage destinations on
its banks from the Mountains to the Sea. Traditionally ascribed to 3102 B.C.,
the dates of the events described in the Mahabharat War between the Kauravas
and Pandavas still remain to be fully settled among the wider stream of
Historians, who place it between 1000 to 3000 B.C. But, the antiquity is
undeniable and as an inseparable part of Indian culture, the Mahabharata still
retains its popularity across India and serves as a source of religious and
traditional wisdom.
| The Pandava Brothers, Pandava Temple, Panr (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
The
Mahabharata is not just about the ancient war, but is in fact also a
compilation of stories then popular in ancient India. All these have been
preserved for generations in the Mahabharata.
However, even as one may doubt the authenticity of the Mahabharat, its
footprints can still surely be felt across India. Wandering anywhere in India,
one does come across various sites ascribed to one or more of the legends from
the Mahabharat. While Kurukshetra is known to have been the site of the actual
war, Delhi as Indraprastha or Gurgaon as Gurgaon always remind. While Hastinapur
still can be traced on the banks of the Ganga, the ancient city of Dwarka has
also been confirmed as submerged under the sea (about 5000 years ago), well
fitting into the ancient descriptions of the Mahabharat. Apart from the more
well known sites, there is an extensive list of other lesser known sites which
have their nomenclature or existence from one of the legends of the Mahabharat.
Journeys
of the Pandavas
Delving
deep into the Mahabharat, it is interesting to note the description of various
ancient sites. If the Mahabharat is to be taken as the poetic and literary
description of actual historical events, it indicates an extensive travel by
the Pandavas throughout the length and breadth of ancient India. The sites on
the trail if followed and explored carefully may further attest to the reality
of the legends connecting them. Extensive travelers and explorers that the
Pandavas were as described, their journeys[iv]
in ancient and well forested India started in their early life itself and
continued later till they finally left for the Himalayas and ascended to
Swargaloka. Keeping in mind the nature of the extensive travels of the Pandavas
across India for long durations, if considered authentic, it is quite natural
that some memories may have been preserved in some form by the succeeding
generations. Travelling across India does generate such feelers indeed as one
comes across living memories of the stay and journey of the Pandavas still
inscribed in the minds of the existing generations and having survived intact
through the ensuing centuries. Most of the sites described in the Mahabharat
however, are now forgotten on the Map though, and systematic attempts thus need
to be made for their proper identification.
| Images at Pandava Temple, Panr (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
As
a traveler notes, many lesser known places are still associated with legends at
the local level. However, a holistic survey like the one carried out during the
Archaeological Survey of Buddhist sites based on the travelogues of Hieun Tsang
and Fa Hien seem not to have been undertaken with the same level of sincerity,
even though efforts seem to have been made in bits and pieces, as in the case
of excavations made at Hastinapur and the Old Fort complex in Delhi by the
Archaeological Survey of India. Given the antiquity of the Mahabharat, to be
able to sift actual historical significance of sites from the local legendary
associations is an uphill task indeed, but
is one which provides immense scholarly satisfaction and opens new
vistas of historical understanding; and thus must be attempted.
Following
the Mahabharat Trail in Bihar
Panr in the Mahabharat trail ?
Panr being one of the sites still remembered as visited by
the Pandavas, with the recent archaeological evidence dating it back by
thousands of years, has the potential to shed much light on our understanding
of the ancient history of the region. If
tradition is to be relied upon, the Pandavas during their exile also visited
some other places in Mithila like Pandoul in Madhubani, as mentioned by the
Gazetteer. I thus tried
to look for any specific reference of the site of Panr in the Mahabharat.
However, even as I could not come across a specific description about the site
in the Mahabharat, I could infer that it may have been visited during one of
the journeys, the memory of which may have survived in local legends and thus
gave the place its name. As nothing in this regard can be stated conclusively,
I analysed several ancient routes used by ancient travelers and discovered that
12 prominent routes of pilgrimage in ancient India have been noted by the
Historian S M Bhardwaj (1973)[v]. Two
of these routes were the land route from Nimisha to Gaya and another from Gaya
to Gaurisikhara, possibly in the Himalayas and then to the Karatoya river in
modern Bangladesh. Another ancient Buddhist age route between Vaishali to
Champa has been mentioned by Mithila Sharan Pandey[vi], who was not sure about the
exact place where the Ganga was crossed, which then in 1963 was at Manihari as
the bridge on Ganga did not exist The most important place between Vaisali and
Champa was Bhaddiya, which has been identified as Munger by Rahul Sankrityayana
but as some other place near Bhagalpur by Pandey.[vii]
Till recently, it was believed that the antiquity of human
settlements in north-central Bihar comprising districts such as Samastipur,
Begusarai, Darbhanga and Madhubani was not so deep. In fact the settlement
history of this district was often supposed to begin from the medieval period.
But recent diggings at Chechar, Ramchaura and Paṇr have shown the antiquity of
the region to be much older. The explorations in the surroundings of Paṇr have
brought out several sites yielding Neolithic sherds as at ‘Bhaddiya’ just about
20 kms. south of Paṇr or chalcolithic sherds as at Mangalgarh 35 kms northeast
of Paṇr and at Manda 30 kms north of the site. A new page has been added to the
rich cultural history of Bihar as 6,000 year old human civilization has been
unearthed during the excavations. The results usher in a new era for the study
of human history in the region as the traditional sources need to be
accomodated in the analysis of the development of these sites in ancient times
along with the scientific evidence.
![]() |
| Probable Route of Bheem during Digvijaya of the Eastern Sector |
Panr
could be an important site lying on the ancient pilgrimage route from Gaya to
Gourisikhara, where the Ganga was crossed. Panr may have lied on the cross
junction of ancient routes connecting Vaishali and Champa and that from
Rajgriha to the capital of Mithila. Pandey has noted the possibility of ancient
routes from all major cities to Rajgriha followed by Pataliputra in the
Buddhist age on the maxim that “All roads lead to Rome”. This does build up a
case of Panr as being an important crossing point of the Ganga on the route
from Mithila to Rajgriha. Describing the ancient routes, Alexander Cunningham
has noted the route of the Buddhist Pilgrim Hieun Tsang who crossed to
Pataliputra from Vaishali, and thus did not visit Panr. It seems that in due
course of time by the post Gupta age, the site of Panr lost its importance
after Mithila’s loss of independence to Vaishali and later Magadha.
With
a background of the ancient routes, it is interesting to study the movements of
the Pandavas in Bihar[viii],
which have been recorded at several places in the Mahabharat starting with the
journey of Arjuna who travelled eastward from the forest of Naimisha to the mighty river Ganga and Gaya, and whose[ix] route
may have included Panr.
![]() |
| Probable Route of Krishna and Pandavas from Indraprastha to Rajgriha |
A higher probability however exists of Krishna himself
having stayed at Panr along with Bheem and Arjun, during the peculiar route
taken to visit Rajgir from Indraprastha
to fight with Jarasandha. The
Mahabharat has described them[x] as
having proceeded from the Kuru country to Mithila via the Himalayan foothills
and then having crossed the Ganga and the Son, as having moved further
eastwards to reach the Barabar Hills and finally Rajgir. Panr may perhaps have
been the place where the Pandavas had stayed for some time prior to crossing
the Ganga on their way. But as one can see from the Map, they did not seemingly
cross the Ganga at Panr though must have passed through, considering the
description that they had initially crossed the Gandak and thereafter the Ganga
and the Sone. A Map constructed on a website[xi]
shows the path followed by the trio (Bhima, Krishna and Arjuna) as they
traveled to Magadha which includes the probable visit to Panr. One is however
struck with the strangeness[xii] of the abnormal route to reach Magadha from Indraprastha, which has been explained by some scholars as due to their having
travelled in disguise and thus having probably
mostly traveled along the territories of those kings who though suffering from
the dominating power of Jarasandha were not yet under his direct control.
Mithila
Sharan Pandey[xiii]
has also noted the two Mahabharat routes of travel adopted during the fight
with Jarasandha and again during Bheem’s conquest of the eastern quarter. He
mentions that there may have been an ancient route from the eastern bank of the
Sone to the Gorathgiri (Barabar) Hills, which may have been the route in
continuation of another route traced in the Ramayana, though not in present
usage. The route from Gorathgiri to Rajgriha is stated as still under use. The Pandavas may have again visited Panr
moving for their pilgrimage during the 12 year exile and perhaps again by Bheem
during the Digvijaya in the east. From the descriptions of the ancient routes,
it transpires that Panr may have been used as a halt on the Ganga by ancient
pilgrims and other traders during their journeys. Importantly, the old bed of the Ganga can
still be seen near Panr and the antiquity of the settlement has been attested
to by the recent excavations which date a culture without Neolithic tools as
early as 4261 BC. It is very likely that Panr was an important settlement on
the banks of the Ganga and on the border of Mithila with Magadha.
Perspective
The
Mahabharat stories were so popular that anything seemingly ancient but not well
known was often fitted into one of the stories from the epic. Several sites in
India are thus often associated with legends, the origin of which is often
doubtful. Many a times, such legends are created by someone who is not ignorant
about the falsity of it, but is often so much overawed by the ancientness of
the site that he cultivates a legend which is easily acceptable by gullible
innocent devotees, and gradually transforms into a tradition over the years,
the history of which is not traceable. For instance, Bhimbetka, a Palaeolithic
site in Madhya Pradesh which also houses prehistoric cave paintings is actually
named after Bheem, the mighty Pandava as were several Mauryan era sites with
Ashokan pillars in the past called as ‘Laths of Bheem’. Similar has been the
case at Bagh in Madhya Pradesh, where the caves with Boddhisatva images were
taken to be representing the Pandavas. Sikligarh, Purnea, Bihar another ancient site
became associated with the legend of Prahlad and Hiranyakashyapa. In several
towns across India, one comes across boards across temples which declare them
as ‘Pandav-kalin’ i.e. of the time of the Pandavas. While the same may not
always be true as was the case with the Mauryan pillars as later discovered, a
common binding thread is indeed the antiquity of the sites, the accounts of
which are often lacking or missing in recorded history. However, seeing their importance they do
deserve to be explored further especially when of the more than 400 ancient
pilgrimage destinations described in the Mahabharat, only some have been
positively identified. An exploration exercise such as this would include the
study of ancient routes from various sources, satellite imagery and physical
archaeological excavations.
| Pandava Images at Panr (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
If
the Mahabharat journey is not taken as an authentic fact, it is quite possible
that an hypothesis may have been generated about the stay of the Pandavas in
some ancient times about Panr which lied on the important ancient cross
junction connecting Mithila and Magadha and also Vaishali and Champa. The
excavations have indicated that the site was probably abandoned in post-Gupta
times, even as the adjoining areas of the mound still await further excavation.
If the present-day village is taken to have been settled around the turn of the
eighteenth century, as the excavation suggests it may have been so that the
recent settlers being quite aware of the antiquity of the site having come
across such remnants at the site of settlement may have ascribed it to the
times of the Pandavas. As it stands on date, it is not clearly known whether
the name Panr was known as such in the medieval times as well. It may so have
happened that the temple site may have been revered still and due to the
antiquity, the remains may have been ascribed to have been visited by the
Pandavas during their journeys. But why such a legend should have originated is
not clear and interestingly from the timings as obtained about the antiquity of
Panr the site certainly had a civilization at the time of the Mahabharat war,
the date of which is often quoted in the range between 1000 to 3100 BC by
different historians, the traditional date of course being around 3102 BC. The
Mahabharat connection is thus suggested but remains to be confirmed with
evidence from other more possible sources apart from tradition.
Conclusion
The
dating of settlements in North India has always been debated. Traditonally
ascribed to much earlier dates, the archaeological evidence has often been
found lacking. The K P Jayaswal Institute’s report mentions Lahuradewa (Sant
Kabir Nagar dist. U.P), where the early period has dates ranging between
9000-3000 BC, without yielding any Neolithic tools. Other scholars[xiv]
have also noted the early dates of finds from various places in the Middle
Ganga plains. The early remains of Paṇr still remain to be fully analysed for
it to be classified either as Neolithic or an Early Farming phase (as
Lahuradewa). Yet, such early dates for human culture in the Ganga Valley and
the absence of lithic tools at several sites such as Narhan, Lahuradewa and Paṇr
have opened up new possibilities and the need to accentuate further research in
the middle and lower Ganga valley. The materials of other recently excavated
sites thus need to be re-examined in the light of the results at Panr. Further
a re-assessment of sites in the vicinity said to be traditionally associated
with the Mahabharat like Pandaul in Madhubani, or Mahishi in Saharsa also needs
to be done. Interestingly, the findings at Panr have suggested the early
origins of farming techniques like crop rotation and multiple cropping, and of
trade of agriculture products between Bihar and the eastern world, as well as
the West. Crops including rice, green gram, barley, wheat, lentils, and grass
pea, dating back to 4200 BC, were found at the site. A preliminary study of a
sample of skeletal remains also revealed the presence of buffalo, goat, spotted
deer, blackbuck, gazelle, wild pig, porcupine, hare, peafowl, common teal,
Ganges soft shell turtle, Indian mud turtle and others during the same period,
indicating domestication of animals.
![]() |
| Excavated Remains at Panr (Photo Courtesy - Aditi Nandan from http://www.artzindia.com) |
While earlier excavations did not give any information
regarding exchange of trade and agricultural practices between Bihar and the
rest of the world, the new findings reveal otherwise. Further scientific study
of the history of agriculture in the state would reveal more aspects of
practice in ancient times and animal husbandry in the region. There is a need
to compare the botanical remains from the historical period in Bihar with
respect to those from other regions during the same period so that we can
understand the history of agriculture in Bihar and the rest of the country.
This will be possible only by adopting multi-disciplinary scientific approach
to study zoological and botanical remains in the state. The limited excavation
at Pandav Sthan has thus been a huge achievement as it has confirmed the history
of this place since 4,000 B.C and thus in times coterminus with the supposed incidents of the Mahabharat. There is need of extensive excavation at the
site, conservation of the remains and development of the site as a tourist
spot.
| Students of the School near Pandava Sthana (Photo dated 22nd June, 2015) |
References :-
1.
ASI, Indian Archaeology, A Review,
1972-73, 1974-75, 1982-83
2.
Mahabharat, Adi Parva (Adhyaya 214,
Shlokas 6-9), Sabha Parva (Adhyaya 15-24, 29-30), Van Parva (Adhyaya 95,
Shlokas 8-21, Adhyaya 110, Shlokas 1-26, Adhyaya 114, Shloka 1), Published by
Gita Press
3.
K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute – Archaeological
Excavations at Panr, Report as published on their website http://kpjri.res.in at
http://kpjri.res.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Panr-overview.pdf
4.
The Historical Geography and
Topography of Bihar, Mithila Sharan Pandey, Patna
University, Published by Motilal Banarsidas (1963)
5.
Archaeological Geography of the Ganga Plain, The Lower and the
Middle Ganga, Dilip K Chakrabarty
6.
History of Mithila, Upendra Thakur (1956), Mithila Institute, Darbhanga
7.
Civilizational Regions of Mithila and Mahakoshal, Makhan Jha, Capital Publishing House, Delhi (1982)
8.
Bihar through the Ages, R R Diwakar, Orient
Longmans (1959)
9.
Cultural Heritage of Mithila, Vijayakanta Mishra, Mithila Prakasan, Allahabad (1979)
10.
Darbhanga District Gazetteer, P C Roy Choudhary
(1964)
11.
The Glories of Magadha, J N Samaddar, Patna University Readership Lectures, (1922) Page 45
12.
The Ancient Geography of India, A Cunningham (1871)
13.
Studies In The Geography Of
Ancient And Medieval India, D C Sircar, Motilal
Banarsidas (1971)
14.
American
International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, March-May,
2014, Early Centres of Origin of
Agriculture in the Middle Ganga Plain, Dr. Shitala Prasad
Singh, Gorakhpur University (Available online at http://www.iasir.net)
15.
Indian Practice of
Pilgrimage and the Growth of the Mahabharata, Yaroslav Vassilkov, Proceedings of
the Second Dubrovnik International Conference on the Sanskrit Epics and
Puranas, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Art, August 1999 (2002)
[i]
The
original epic is believed to have
started with just 24,000 verses, as the ‘Jayaparva’ or the ‘Bharat parva’,
different editions of which over time gave it the present shape having more
than 1,00,000 verses in chaste Sanskrit – and of course the biggest epic of the
world.
[ii] History of
Mithila, Upendra Thakur (1956), Page 2, Mithila is bounded on the north by the
Himalayas, on the east, south and west by the rivers Kosi (Kausiki), Ganga and
Gandaki respectively.
[iv] The first journey started as
when they had attained the age of about 14 years after
they were born on the Himalayas (at Satshringa Parvat on the Gandhamadan Mountain). Days after the death of Pandu,
the Pandava family travelled to Hastinapur, the Kuru capital, which took about 3 weeks. During the stay at Hastinapur,
they were asked to proceed to Varnavat, where they survived the Lakshagriha and
further roamed around the jungles for about a year till they surfaced at the
swayamvar of Draupadi in the Panchal country. After being appointed as the
rulers over Indraprastha, Arjun had to
spend 12 years in the forest outside the capital when he is said to have toured
several pilgrimage destinations across India. After Arjun’s return the
Khandavvan around the capital city is said to have been consumed by fire and in
the new assembly hall built by the demon Maya, Yuddhisthir is said to have
desired for the performance of the Rajasuya yagya. At this stage, Krishna along
with Arjun and Bheem travelled to Rajgir, the capital of Magadha in order to
kill Jarasandha, who was the strongest monarch of the times and had captured
several kings from the other kingdoms, whom he proposed to sacrifice to Lord
Rudra. After the victory over Jarasandha, the four Pandava brothers Arjun
(North), Bheem (East), Nakul (West) and Sahdeo (South) are said to have
travelled in the four cardinal directions for a digvijaya over the Kings before
proclamation of Yuddhisthir as the King of Kings or Samrat (Emperor). On their
successful return, Yuddhisthir is said to have performed the famous Rajasuya
yagya which was attended by Kings from across the Indian subcontinent and
abroad including the sea islands along with presents. After losing in the game
of dice, they were ousted out of Hastinapur, and forced to stay in the forests
for 12 long years with another year of anonymity. During the 12 years of the
forest life, the Pandavas moved around different parts of the country for
pilgrimage for almost 5 years after staying at Dwaitvan and Kamakyavan on the
banks of the Saraswati for a year. Then at the sixth year they travelled uphill
on the Himalayan ranges where they stayed at Badrikashrama for the next 5
years. The last year before the anonymous one year stay in the kingdom of Virat
(Matsya) was also spent in Dwaitvan and Kamakyavan. After return from the
forest, the Mahabharat war ensued after which the Pandavas ruled from their
capital till finally ascending the Himalayas to reach their end in heaven as
described in ‘Swarg-Arohan Parva’ of the text.
[v] Archaeological Geography of
the Ganga Plain, The Lower and the Middle Ganga, Dilip K Chakrabarty, Pages
16-17
[vi]
Page 195, Routes in the
Buddhist age, The Historical Geography and Topography of Bihar, Mithila Sharan
Pandey, Patna University, Published by Motilal Banarsidas (1963)
[vii] Page 195, Ibid
[viii]
As noted above Ibid
[ix] Mahabharat, Adi Parva
[x]
During the journey Krishna, Bheema and Arjuna took up the guise of brahmins and
proceeded from the Kuru country crossing midway the Kurujangal region to reach
Padma-sarovar. Thence crossing the Kalakuta mountain they moved ahead crossing
the rivers including Gandaki, Mahason, Sadanira and rivers of Ekparvatak
pradesha. Prior to these they had also crossed the Saryu to reach Kosala
region. From Kosala they traversed while visiting several rivers to reach
Mithila. Then crossing the Ganga and the Son, they started moving eastwards.
Moving along they reached the boundaries of Magadha. Then they reached the Goratha
Hill (Barabar in Jehanabad) from
where they saw the capital of Magadha. The Gorath Hill abounded in
cattle-wealth, water resources and beautiful flora. Krishna pointed to the
beauty of the large Magadha capital which had a lot of animals. There was no
dearth of water and the city, free of disease was full of beautiful palaces.
Suitable for Viharas, there were the five hills named as Vipula, Varaha,
Vrishabha (Rishabha), Rishigiri (Matang) and Chaityaka. With high peaks, the
five beautiful hills were decorated with shadowy trees and together seemed like
guarding the city of Girivraja.
[xii] It could have been reached easier via Hastinapura
and along the Ganga. The trio avoided it probably to avoid the spies of their
enemy Duryodhana
who ruled at Hastinapura.
As described, during former Arjuna's Pilgrimage
too he had avoided traveling through Hastinapura.
Besides being an enemy of the Pandavas, Duryodhana was an ally of Jarasandha.
Another way was to travel along Yamuna
river that flowed near by Indraprastha
itself, and then join Ganga to reach Magadha. But this would have required
passing through Mathura
which has been stated as under the control of Jarasandha. The trio probably
avoided the territories of kings who had strong alliance with Jarasandha or of
those who were under the direct control of Jarasandha like Kasi, Vatsa, Chedi, Surasena etc. Hence the route wasn't the shortest
one but the one that offered more secrecy and safety. Thus the route was
charted along the southern foot-hills of the Himalayas along the kingdoms like Kosala and Mithila.
[xiii]
Page 193-194, Routes Indicated in the Mahabharat, The Historical Geography and
Topography of Bihar, Mithila Sharan Pandey, Patna University, Published by
Motilal Banarsidas (1963)













Awesome,
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for sharing such an awesome blog... Bharat Taxi is one of the leading taxi and Cab Services provider in all over India.
ReplyDeleteThis is excellent post, Good work done dear admin,
We specialize the the India’s tour formerly the Taj Destination Tour, and different types of Taj Mahal Tour, which are easily available on- www.splendidtajholidays.com
✔Some Adventures Tours are-
Same Day Agra Tour by Car
Sunrise Taj Mahal Tour
Same Day Agra Tour by Train
✔Other Special Tours
Golden Triangle Tour 4 Days | Golden Triangle Tour 3 Days | Golden Triangle Tour 5 Days
For more Information contact us-
+91-9927841719
Or Email us- theparvezkhan@gmail.com
I really like your writing style, great information, thank you for posting
ReplyDeleteOnline structural engineer
معلم سيراميك باكستاني
ReplyDeleteGreat insights shared in this post. Really enjoyed reading your perspective and the way you explained everything so clearly. Looking forward to more such content.
ReplyDeleteHow to Reach Manali From Delhi
How to Reach Rameshwaram from Delhi
How to Reach Darjeeling from Delhi
How to Reach Dharamshala Himachal Pradesh
How to plan Bangalore Mysore Ooty Coorg trip
How to Reach Nainital from Delhi